The Radeon RX 560 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3090 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €161.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 75 vs 350 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 95% cheaper – €8.99 vs €169.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce RTX 3090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
162
100%
Min 1% FPS
99
100%
Price, €
€8.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€8.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€2,569.09
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,943.11
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€2,189.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
12%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
15%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
7%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 18th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
$99.00 | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
Polaris | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 350 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
20.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 189.8 GPixel/s |
81.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 556 GTexel/s |
2.611 TFLOPS | FP32 | 35.58 TFLOPS |