The Radeon RX 560 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only €77.80 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Up to 31% cheaper – €169.99 vs €247.79
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 75 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
63%
Min 1% FPS
23
52%
Price, €
€169.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.26/FPS
91%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€247.79
68%
Value, €/FPS
€2.98/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€247.79
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€555.70
In Stock
Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
24%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
48%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
48%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 18th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
$99.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Polaris | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
| 81.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
| 2.611 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
