The Radeon RX 5500M is a slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5500M
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5500M
Oct 7th, 2019
Average FPS
69
88%
Min 1% FPS
35
85%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
78
100%
Min 1% FPS
41
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5500M
Oct 7th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
78%
Pixel Fillrate
52.64 GPixel/s
69%
Texture Fillrate
144.8 GTexel/s
95%
FP32
4.632 TFLOPS
95%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.884 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5500M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 16 Mobile |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
85 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
52.64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 76.32 GPixel/s |
144.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 152.6 GTexel/s |
4.632 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.884 TFLOPS |