The Radeon RX 5500 XT is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 270X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5500 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 130 vs 180 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon RX 5500 XT is better in every way
Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon R9 270X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5500 XT
Dec 12th, 2019
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
70%
Min 1% FPS
23
62%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon R9 270X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon R9 270X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Radeon R9 270X in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5500 XT
Dec 12th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
59.04 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
162.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.196 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
80%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
57%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
52%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5500 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Dec 12th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Navi | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
130 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
59.04 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 33.6 GPixel/s |
162.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 84 GTexel/s |
5.196 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.688 TFLOPS |