Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon RX 550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon RX 550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 2219 days newer than Radeon RX 550.
Advantages of Radeon RX 550
- Up to 59% better value when playing No Man's Sky than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - €1.43 vs €3.50 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 50 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 131% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon RX 550 - 162 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon RX 550 - 16 vs 2 GB
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2017
FPS
70
43%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6702 minutes ago
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.5/FPS
41%
Price, €
€567
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €567 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7507 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2017
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
16%
Texel Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
11%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon RX 550 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Apr 20th, 2017 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Polaris | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$79 | MSRP | $499 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
1183 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |