Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Radeon R9 Nano is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 175 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The GPU's performance with selected game settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
75
61%
Min 1% FPS
37
52%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Average FPS
123
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
84%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
48%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
51%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
Oct 19th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
608.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
99%
FP32
16.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2022 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Pirate Islands (R9 300) | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
