The Radeon R9 290X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6650 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290X
The Radeon RX 6650 XT is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 176 vs 290 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 290X vs Radeon RX 6650 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 290X
Oct 24th, 2013
Average FPS
67
63%
Min 1% FPS
33
55%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€264
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.46/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€264.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€411.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€430.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€768.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€552.20
In Stock
Radeon R9 290X vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 290X vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 290X vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 290X
Oct 24th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
38%
Texture Fillrate
176 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
5.632 TFLOPS
52%
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 290X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 24th, 2013 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$549.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
290 W | Power Consumption | 176 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 280.3 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 168.6 GPixel/s |
176 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 337.3 GTexel/s |
5.632 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.79 TFLOPS |