The Radeon R9 280 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 280
- Consumes up to 13% less energy – 200 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 3 GB
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Average FPS
53
43%
Min 1% FPS
24
33%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Average FPS
124
100%
Min 1% FPS
72
100%
Price, €
€558
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.5/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€558.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€502.89
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,044.10
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€969.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€788.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,147.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€816.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€887.91
In Stock
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
18%
Texture Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
3.344 TFLOPS
25%
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.21 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 280 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 3rd, 2021 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $479.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
200 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| Memory | ||
| 3 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.86 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| 104.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 413 GTexel/s |
| 3.344 TFLOPS | FP32 | 13.21 TFLOPS |
