The Radeon R9 280 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7500. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 280
The Radeon PRO W7500 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 70 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 3 GB
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon PRO W7500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Average FPS
53
63%
Min 1% FPS
24
53%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€457.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.45/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon PRO W7500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon PRO W7500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon PRO W7500 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
55%
FP32
3.344 TFLOPS
27%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
72%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 280 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 200 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 3 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.86 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 108.8 GPixel/s |
| 104.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 190.4 GTexel/s |
| 3.344 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS |
