The Radeon R9 270X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 180 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
30%
Min 1% FPS
23
22%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, €
€1029.98
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.05/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€1,029.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,822.86
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€599.00
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
31%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
11%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |