The Radeon R9 270X is a slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 75 vs 180 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
93%
Min 1% FPS
23
92%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, €
€169.94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.08/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€169.94
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€180.62
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
75%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
63%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
80%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
80%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |