The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 980. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 9% less energy – 150 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 980 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
71%
Min 1% FPS
22
63%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 980
Sep 19th, 2014
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, €
€798
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.4/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 980 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 980 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 980 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
80%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
38%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
48%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
48%
GeForce GTX 980
Sep 19th, 2014
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
77.82 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
155.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.981 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 980 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 19th, 2014 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 77.82 GPixel/s |
| 74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 155.6 GTexel/s |
| 2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.981 TFLOPS |
