The Radeon R9 270 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1080. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 150 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1080
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1080 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Average FPS
50
54%
Min 1% FPS
22
44%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1080
May 27th, 2016
Average FPS
92
100%
Min 1% FPS
50
100%
Price, €
€1256.88
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.66/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1080 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1080 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 1080 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270
Nov 13th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
56%
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
74 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
2.368 TFLOPS
27%
GeForce GTX 1080
May 27th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
110.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
277.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.873 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1080 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 13th, 2013 | Release Date | May 27th, 2016 |
$179.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5X |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
29.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 110.9 GPixel/s |
74 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 277.3 GTexel/s |
2.368 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.873 TFLOPS |