The Radeon R7 240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
39%
Min 1% FPS
16
28%
Price, €
€51.28
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
16%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
5%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 448 GFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
