The Radeon R7 240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 290. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 30 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R9 290 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Average FPS
65
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R9 290 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R9 290 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R9 290 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
9%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 5.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 60.61 GPixel/s |
| 14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 151.5 GTexel/s |
| 448 GFLOPS | FP32 | 4.849 TFLOPS |
