The Radeon R7 240 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 83% less energy – 30 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
41
47%
Min 1% FPS
16
34%
Price, €
€51.28
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 240
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
73.6 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
448 GFLOPS
5%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 2nd, 2017 |
$69.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
5.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 255.8 GTexel/s |
448 GFLOPS | FP32 | 8.186 TFLOPS |