The Radeon Pro WX 9100 is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 75 vs 230 Watts
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
65%
Min 1% FPS
25
56%
Price, €
€181.54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.3/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€181.54
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 9100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
46%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
17%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
17%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 9100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| $1,599.00 | MSRP | $139.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 230 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| HBM2 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 2048-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
384 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
12.29 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |
