The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 75 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Nov 18th, 2016
Average FPS
51
49%
Min 1% FPS
22
38%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Nov 18th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
36%
Pixel Fillrate
34.75 GPixel/s
29%
Texture Fillrate
121.6 GTexel/s
40%
FP32
3.892 TFLOPS
40%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 5100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 18th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 34.75 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
| 121.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
| 3.892 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |
