Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3060 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is 518 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 66% better value when playing Battlefield IV than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti - €0.86 vs €2.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti - 65 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Performs up to 59% better in Battlefield IV than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 267 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 8 vs 4 GB
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
168
63%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€144.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €144.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7090 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2020
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.54/FPS
34%
Price, €
€678.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €678.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7896 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
16%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
16%
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2020 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 30 |
$199 | MSRP | $399 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 12-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1410 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |