The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only €71.80 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 34% cheaper – €138.99 vs €210.79
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 65 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
40%
Min 1% FPS
21
30%
Price, €
€138.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.83/FPS
61%
Buy on Amazon
€210.79
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€262.52
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€229.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€271.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€347.56
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
10%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 3200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
65 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20.72 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 41.44 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 1.658 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
