The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €41.32 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 35 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 16% cheaper – €215.99 vs €257.31
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Average FPS
45
37%
Min 1% FPS
18
25%
Price, €
€257.31
83%
Value, €/FPS
€5.71/FPS
31%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, €
€215.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.77/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€215.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€275.48
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€228.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€271.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€359.55
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
9%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
7%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
7%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro WX 2100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Radeon Pro Polaris | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 19.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 39.01 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 1.248 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
