Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W5500 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W5500 is 293 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W5500
- Performs up to 3% better in FIFA 23 than GeForce GTX 1650 - 165 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 20% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Radeon Pro W5500 - €1.36 vs €1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5500 - 75 vs 125 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
80%
Price, €
€279
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7112 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
160
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7111 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
57%
Radeon Pro W5500 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$399 | MSRP | $149 |
4x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1744 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1855 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |