The Radeon 760M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6650 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 760M
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 15 vs 176 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6650 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
56
52%
Min 1% FPS
26
43%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€411.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.85/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€411.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€571.25
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€552.20
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€264.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€768.98
In Stock
Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 760M vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
41.58 GPixel/s
25%
Texture Fillrate
83.17 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
5.323 TFLOPS
49%
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 760M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
Navi III IGP | Generation | Navi II |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 176 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 8 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 280.3 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
41.58 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 168.6 GPixel/s |
83.17 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 337.3 GTexel/s |
5.323 TFLOPS | FP32 | 10.79 TFLOPS |