Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon 660M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 135 days newer than Radeon 660M.
Advantages of Radeon 660M
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 40 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 6100% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon 660M - 62 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon 660M - 16 vs 0 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€602.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €602.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon 660M | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 16 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
1900 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |