Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro W5500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro W5500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is 1193 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro W5500.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
- Performs up to 42% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Radeon Pro W5500 - 505 vs 355 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Up to 36% cheaper than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB - €245.99 vs €382.21
- Up to 9% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB - €0.69 vs €0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB - 125 vs 160 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
505
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
90%
Price, €
€382.21
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €382.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
FPS
355
70%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€245.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €245.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
59.36 GPixel/s
48%
Texel Fillrate
163.2 GTexel/s
47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 |
---|---|---|
May 18th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 10th, 2020 |
GeForce 40 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
$399 | MSRP | $399 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 16-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
2310 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1744 MHz |
2535 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1855 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |