Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 295X2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is 3171 days newer than Radeon R9 295X2.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Performs up to 28% better in Dead Space than Radeon R9 295X2 - 69 vs 54 FPS
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 50 vs 500 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 6 vs 4 GB
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
84.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
140.4 GTexel/s
78%
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
77%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
GeForce 40 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
96-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1455 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
1755 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |