Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce MX130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 813 days older than GeForce MX130.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 30 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 11% better in Counter-Strike 2 than GeForce MX130 - 361 vs 325 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX130 - 4 vs 2 GB
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce MX130
Mobile • Nov 17th, 2017
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 64-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1109 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1189 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
