Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce MX130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1354 days older than GeForce MX130.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 30 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 16% better in Far Cry 6 than GeForce MX130 - 73 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX130 - 3 vs 2 GB
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce MX130
Mobile • Nov 17th, 2017
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX130
Mobile • Nov 17th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
9.512 GPixel/s
31.855324849296718%
Texel Fillrate
28.54 GTexel/s
27.311004784688997%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1109 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1189 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
