Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms GeForce GTX 765M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 131 days newer than GeForce GTX 765M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 75 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 7% better in Far Cry 3 than GeForce GTX 765M - 141 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M - 3 vs 2 GB
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 765M
Mobile • May 30th, 2013
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 765M
Mobile • May 30th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
13.81 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
55.23 GTexel/s
43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 700M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 64.13 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 797 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
| 863 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1002 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
