Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 750 Ti on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1890 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Up to 44% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €89.0 vs €157.99
- Up to 35% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than GeForce GTX 1650 - €1.27 vs €1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 60 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 16% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 81 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 4 vs 2 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
FPS
70
86%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
81
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.95/FPS
65%
Price, €
€157.99
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €157.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
46%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Feb 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 700 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$149 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1020 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1085 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1350 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |