Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GTX 675M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 712 days newer than GeForce GTX 675M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 100 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 23 than GeForce GTX 675M - 168 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M - 3 vs 2 GB
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GTX 675M
Mobile • Mar 22nd, 2012
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 675M
Mobile • Mar 22nd, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
9.92 GPixel/s
33%
Texel Fillrate
39.68 GTexel/s
37%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 600M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 620 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| 750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
