Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1106 days newer than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 150 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 42% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 660 Ti - 57 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti - 4 vs 2 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Desktop • Aug 16th, 2012
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Desktop • Aug 16th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
27.44 GPixel/s
42%
Texel Fillrate
109.8 GTexel/s
42%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 16th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$299 | MSRP | $649 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 192-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 144.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 915 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 980 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
