Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290 outperforms GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290 is 224 days newer than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 134 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290
- Performs up to 22% better in The Callisto Protocol than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost - 67 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost - 4 vs 2 GB
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Desktop • Mar 26th, 2013
Radeon R9 290
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Desktop • Mar 26th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
16.51 GPixel/s
27.23972941758786%
Texel Fillrate
66.05 GTexel/s
43.5973597359736%
Radeon R9 290
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 26th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$169 | MSRP | $399 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 144.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
980 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 947 MHz |
| 1032 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
