Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 460 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1872 days newer than GeForce GTX 460.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 160 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 41% better in DOOM Eternal than GeForce GTX 460 - 182 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 433% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 - 4 vs 0.75 GB
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jul 12th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 12th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
9.45 GPixel/s
14%
Texel Fillrate
37.8 GTexel/s
14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
GeForce 400 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $649 |
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.75 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
192-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |