Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R7 240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1983 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 29% better in Rust than Radeon R7 240 - 107 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 6 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Up to 82% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 - €59.9 vs €331.63
- Up to 77% better value when playing Rust than GeForce GTX 1660 - €0.72 vs €3.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 30 vs 120 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.1/FPS
23%
Price, €
€331.63
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €331.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Buy for €59.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Mar 14th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$219 | MSRP | $69 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |