Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1062 days older than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 45% better in Control than Radeon Pro W6400 - 64 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 50 vs 120 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
64
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€598.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €598.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
65%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$279 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1770 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |