Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon R9 390X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 1405 days newer than Radeon R9 390X.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Radeon R9 390X - 58 vs 55 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - 8 vs 6 GB
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon R9 390X
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
64.08 GPixel/s
95.35714285714285%
Texel Fillrate
128.2 GTexel/s
69.37229437229436%
Radeon R9 390X
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
67.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
184.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $429 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
1140 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1050 MHz |
| 1335 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
