Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon R5 230 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 1846 days older than the more expensive GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 21% better in World of Warcraft than GeForce GTX 1650 - 180 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €82.23 vs €157.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing World of Warcraft than GeForce GTX 1650 - €0.46 vs €1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 19 vs 75 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €157.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |