Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2389 days newer than Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 29% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Radeon R7 240 - 58 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 30 vs 50 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €59.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $69 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |