Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6800 is 411 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6800 - 50 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Performs up to 63% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 202 vs 124 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 32 vs 4 GB
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €2,014.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65947 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
21.338123035473732%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
17.068965517241384%
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
222.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 8th, 2021 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $2249 |
None | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 32 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2075 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2320 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |