Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W5700 is 135 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5700 - 50 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Performs up to 400% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 35 vs 7 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
FPS
35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€244.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €244.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
31%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
28%
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $799 |
None | Outputs | 5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1880 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |