Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is 2381 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Performs up to 4% better in War Thunder than Radeon R7 260X - 222 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 50 vs 115 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 4 vs 2 GB
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $139 |
None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1100 MHz |
1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1625 MHz |