Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 425 days older than GeForce GTX 1050.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 75 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 17% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than GeForce GTX 1050 - 119 vs 102 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 - 4 vs 2 GB
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GeForce GTX 1050
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1050
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
46.56 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
58.2 GTexel/s
22%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$109 | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1354 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1455 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
