Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1268 days newer than GeForce GTS 450.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 106 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than GeForce GTS 450 - 302 vs 265 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 - 3 vs 1 GB
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 13th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 13th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
6.264 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
25.06 GTexel/s
23%
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
Sep 13th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
GeForce 400 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$129 | MSRP | $279 |
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
57.73 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
783 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
902 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |