Key Differences
In short — Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A380 is 4850 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Performs up to 41% better in Deathloop than GeForce GTS 250 - 65 vs 46 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 75 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
FPS
65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€145.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €145.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15483 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | Intel Arc A380 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 14th, 2022 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Alchemist |
$199 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 96-bit |
64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 186 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |