Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTS 250 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTS 250 is 3022 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 65 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
55%
Texel Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
90%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| $199 | MSRP | $199 |
| 2x DVI | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
| 1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
