Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W5700 outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W5700 is 3912 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5700 - 150 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Performs up to 154% better in Starfield than GeForce GTS 250 - 33 vs 13 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 8 vs 1 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
FPS
33
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€246.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €246.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15961 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$199 | MSRP | $799 |
2x DVI | Outputs | 5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1880 MHz |
1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |