Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GT 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 3536 days newer than GeForce GT 620.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 49 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 1% better in League of Legends than GeForce GT 620 - 368 vs 365 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 - 4 vs 1 GB
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
2.8 GPixel/s
3.7538544040756125%
Texel Fillrate
11.2 GTexel/s
10.008936550491509%
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 700 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
