Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 250E outperforms GeForce GT 435M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 250E is 1070 days newer than GeForce GT 435M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Performs up to 43% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than GeForce GT 435M - 10 vs 7 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GeForce GT 435M
Mobile • Jan 15th, 2011
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 435M
Mobile • Jan 15th, 2011
Pixel Fillrate
2.36 GPixel/s
18.4375%
Texel Fillrate
9.44 GTexel/s
36.875%
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
12.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
25.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 15th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
| 590 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
