Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GT 330M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 2055 days newer than GeForce GT 330M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 23 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 39% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GT 330M - 57 vs 41 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M - 4 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 10th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Jan 10th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
GeForce 300M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | HBM |
128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
575 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |